Usman criticizes the UFC ranking system. It doesn’t accurately reflect the real contenders
Former UFC welterweight champion Kamaru Usman has spoken out against the promotion’s ranking system, claiming it fails to accurately represent the sport’s true top contenders. In a candid interview, Usman expressed frustration with what he perceives as inconsistencies and biases within the ranking process, which he believes undermine the credibility of the UFC’s competitive framework.
The Ranking System Debate
UFC rankings are determined by a panel of media members who vote on the placement of fighters within their respective weight classes. While the system is meant to reflect merit and performance, it has often been criticized for favoring popularity over skill and for being swayed by promotional narratives.
Usman, who reigned as welterweight champion from 2019 to 2022, has firsthand experience with the pressures and politics surrounding rankings. “The rankings should be a clear reflection of who the best fighters are, not who sells the most tickets or makes the most noise,” Usman stated. “Too often, we see fighters leapfrogging others based on hype rather than accomplishments in the octagon.”
Examples of Discontent
Usman pointed to instances where fighters with fewer significant wins were ranked above more accomplished athletes. “There are guys out there who have been grinding, fighting the best in the division, but they’re not getting the recognition they deserve,” he said. “Meanwhile, someone with one flashy win or a big social media following suddenly jumps into the top five.”
While he didn’t name specific fighters, Usman’s comments come at a time when many fans and analysts have raised similar concerns. Fighters with strong promotional backing or vocal online presences often receive favorable matchups or higher rankings, sparking debates about fairness.
Impact on Contender Opportunities
According to Usman, the flaws in the ranking system have real consequences for fighters. “It’s not just about pride or ego,” he explained. “Rankings determine who gets title shots, who gets better contracts, and who has the chance to prove themselves on the biggest stage.”
Usman argued that the UFC’s ranking inconsistencies can delay or deny deserving fighters their opportunities. “When you’ve got guys who are fighting their hearts out and climbing the ladder the hard way, they shouldn’t be overlooked because someone else is better at self-promotion,” he said.
A Call for Transparency
To address the issue, Usman called for greater transparency and accountability in the ranking process. He suggested that criteria such as strength of schedule, quality of opponents, and recent activity should be prioritized over marketability.
“Fans and fighters alike deserve to know how these decisions are made,” Usman stated. “If the UFC wants to maintain its reputation as the premier MMA organization, it needs a ranking system that reflects that.”
Usman’s Legacy
As a former champion with one of the most dominant runs in welterweight history, Usman’s criticisms carry weight. Known for his work ethic and professionalism, he has consistently advocated for fairness and respect within the sport. While his comments may spark controversy, they also highlight a conversation that many within the MMA community feel is long overdue.
With the UFC’s growing global audience, the pressure to address ranking inconsistencies is likely to increase. Whether Usman’s call for change leads to tangible reforms remains to be seen, but his voice adds to the chorus demanding a system that better reflects the spirit of competition.
